For organizations
Enrich every candidate's qualifications — at scale.
Your people earned qualifications they never put on paper. Send us your candidates; we find the standards, certs, tools, and training each role really involved — and flag anything credential-like for your reviewer's sign-off, so nothing is made up. You pay per enriched candidate.
The same tool that powers our consumer product, configured for organizations.
Who it's for
Built for the people who place people.
- Staffing & recruiting agencies
- Outplacement firms
- Workforce boards / American Job Centers
- Veteran-transition & reentry nonprofits
- Community-college career offices
- Government workforce programs
How it works (bulk)
From roster to enriched candidates in four steps.
Send us your batch
A batch of resume files or a CSV of candidates — ten or a full roster. During your pilot we handle intake for you under a signed data-processing agreement, over a secure channel; self-serve bulk upload is in active build. No per-seat setup fee.
We fill in the gaps
Working backwards from each person's experience, we find the skills, standards, and training their role really involved — across a wide range of occupations.
Your team reviews
Per-candidate results; low-confidence items and anything credential-like are held for your review, never claimed on their own. You sign off on what goes out under your name.
Export
Per-candidate and org-level reports, plus ATS-clean resumes where you supplied the file — export as PDF, DOCX, or CSV/JSON for your ATS.
What you get depends on what you send
Send a CSV
Name, role, and employer per candidate. You get a per-candidate qualification report — the skills, standards, and training that role involves, in claimable language, plus a draft skills block. It is not a finished resume — a CSV has no work history, dates, or accomplishments to build one from.
Send resume files
Each candidate's existing resume. We build a full ATS-clean resume from their real history, filled out with the qualifications they left off. Anything credential-like is flagged for sign-off — never made up.
Why it beats the manual way
Consistent, fatigue-free, and honest at scale.
Integrity at scale
We never put a credential on a resume on our own. Anything that looks like a formal certification goes to your reviewer's queue to confirm first — nothing made up.
Finds what's implied
The standards and training a role really involves (IATF, OSHA/LOTO, CLIA, NEC, MOS→civilian translation) that generic resume tools never name.
Honest build status
Today: your reviewers work every candidate in our review queue, and we handle batch intake for you under a data-processing agreement. In active build: self-serve bulk upload with an itemized intake manifest. On the roadmap: API/webhook delivery into your own ATS. We will always tell you which is which.
How we compare
What you're choosing between — and why this wins.
The alternatives are either too slow to scale, too loose to trust, or too expensive per head. Here's the honest comparison.
| What matters at scale | AdaptiveResume | In-house, by hand | Generic AI bulk tools | Human outplacement service |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scales to hundreds or thousands, fast | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ~ |
| Consistent quality across staff & candidates | ✓ | ✗ | ~ | ~ |
| Never makes a credential up | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Low-confidence flagged for YOUR reviewer | ✓ | ~ | ✗ | ~ |
| Finds skills candidates left off | ✓ | ~ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Bulk processing + structured export | ✓ | ✗ | ~ | ✗ |
| Typical cost | per enriched candidate volume tiers · by quote | staff hours doesn't scale | low / per seat accuracy risk | $275–$10k+ per employee |
Cost figures are typical category ranges for comparison, not quotes from specific providers. "~" means it depends on the provider/process.
The manual way
Each recruiter or coach edits each resume by hand. Quality swings with whoever touched it, credentials can go out unchecked under deadline pressure, and it simply doesn't scale past a handful a day.
With AdaptiveResume
Send your batch → consistent enrichment finds real skills → low-confidence items wait for your reviewer → export ATS-clean resumes + a per-candidate review audit report. Your team spends its time reviewing, not retyping — and nothing is made up.
Pricing
Priced per enriched candidate, by volume.
You pay per enriched candidate, with monthly volume tiers — the more you run, the lower the per-candidate rate. We'll size a quote to your volume and buyer type.
- Volume-based monthly tiers
- No per-seat setup fee
- Bulk upload today — API on the roadmap
- Paid pilots, fully credited against your first contract
- The same promise as our consumer product — nothing made up
Prefer plain email? support@adaptiveresume.com works too.
Volume tiers
Per-candidate rate steps down as monthly volume rises.
- Starter volumequote
- Growing volumequote
- High volumequote
- Enterprise / channelquote
Exact tiers and rates are set with you on a short call — sized to your real monthly volume.
Start with a paid pilot on your own candidates.
Bring a real batch. Pilots run at standard rates and are fully credited against your first contract — so you see the enrichment and the integrity flags on your own people, and the pilot money is never spent twice.
Request a pilot quote